Since I already jumped the gun in publishing both of the videos for the two Fbloggers lingerie fashion OOTDs and reviews referred to below, I decided I might as well combine the two reviews into a single post as is now noted in this post's title. If you don't have time to wade through the overly verbose way I redundantly and pretentiously repeat myself again and again in the text (that's a joke) you could simply take look at my lingerie fashion photos for outfit number 1 of 2 and outfit number 2 of 2 (and maybe watch the two very short embedded customer lingerie review YouTube videos) before, hopefully, giving me an opinion on which blouse, which pair of briefs, and which outfit you like better etc. etc. etc..
You might also want to check out the blog links for the Fbloggers, Lbloggers, Bbloggers and fashionistas who commented on my last post. The bloggers who have commented on this blog are fabulous. Their links and the links to their blogs are listed just above the questions I ask at the end of this post.
Fbloggers OOTD and Lingerie Review number 1 out of 2: Tender Bud Print Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs Styled with a Laura Scott Women's Plus Black Crinkled Peasant Blouse:
The "Tender Bud" print of Bali's Skimp Skamp Briefs was the catalyst for my purchase of these panties. Bali Skimp Skamp briefs have been available in a wider range of colours and prints than many other full briefs. I realise this review is coloured by my own personal preferences. I like the fact that the women's nylon panties by Bali Intimates are relatively full cut, but wish they could combine the features I like the most from the different styles in one panty. I love the print, feel of the fabric, high rise and long side seams of the Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs Style 2633. For the most part I like the tailoring of the Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs, but the rear panel of the panty could stand to be a bit more rounded near the side seams, and I prefer a more generously cut gusset, especially near the gusset's rear seam. I am not as big a big fan of vertical back seams as I am gusset seams, even though the vertical back seam may contribute to adding shape to the panty. I prefer the tailoring of the Bali Sleek Comfort Style 2272 which I reviewed in my post titled "A Briefs Update Part 4 - with Customer Lingerie Review Videos" and uploaded a video review of titled: "MOV-male-models-Bali-Sleek_Comfort-full-brief-panties-26.AVI". The nylon fabric of the Sleek Comfort briefs was not woven as finely as the fabric used in the Skimp Skamp Briefs.
Quoting from the Sears webpage: "Stylish smocking and carefree crinkle deliver trendy texture to this Laura Scott women's plus top. Smocking at the neckline, cuffs and hem create a decidedly feminine look, while the keyhole opening with beaded ties lend a laid-back folkloric vibe to this soft, stretch jersey knit top."
"Smocked scoop neck Keyhole opening with beaded front ties Smocked short sleeves Crinkle texture Smocked blouson hem Jersey knit construction Fabric: Polyester/cotton/spandex blend Care: Machine wash Imported"
I purchased the pretty Laura Scott Crinkled Peasant Blouse from Sears and chose to style it in this OOTD and lingerie review in order to provide a sharp contrast with the white background of the Bali Skimp Skamp Tender Bud Print Briefs. I purchased three pairs of these briefs - one each from Freshpair, HerRoom and Bealls. The Laura Scott Peasant top was a touch longer than I had hoped, so I has to tuck it up a bit to reveal the panties I was reviewing. If I had let the blouse drape naturally it would have showcased the blouse's feminine look better and hit at the very low hip.
TRANSCRIPT: "The pair of ladies full brief panties that I'm male-modeling and reviewing in this customer lingerie review video, is Bali Intimates Skimp Skamp full brief panty in Tender Bud Print. Uh, this particular pair of panties is one that I was thinking of wearing to National Underwear Day in Times Square, but chickened out, um, as per usual. Um, this, uh particular brief, the Bali Skimp Skamp Brief was also a former winter, winner in HerRoom's Undie Awards. Uh, the fit and feel is fabulous, the, the material feels wonderful against my skin, and they're a pretty feminine panty. Um, I paired it, uh, today, for this blouse and panty outfit, with a Laura Scott, Scott blouse. Um, these panties remind me why I love so much wearing ladies panties. This customer lingerie review is released into the public domain."
Normally I avoid back seamed panties and would prefer my briefs to have a more generously cut mushroom shaped gusset, but the print won me over because to me it seemed so feminine.
Fbloggers OOTD and Lingerie Review Number 2 of 2: Warner's Modern Brief Panty in Vintage Pink:
It took me a long time to decide which pair of briefs to style with the multi-coloured Alison Brittney chiffon floral ruffle hemmed top to complete my blouse and panty OOTD. I love everything about the Allison Brittney blouse. I also LOVE wearing these feminine vibrant vintage pink full brief nylon panties.
Quoting from Sears webpage about this Alison Brittney blouse: "Let your look blossom in this sheer chiffon women's top from Allison Brittney. Medium-sized vibrant floral prints complement any skin tone in this easy-to-wear chiffon blouse that boasts smocked edging, puff sleeves and frilly ruffles down the front placket. Smocked round neckline Short smocked puff sleeves Ruffle front Smocked waist Peplum hem Woven construction Fabric: Polyester blend Machine wash Imported"
I love the chiffon floral peplum of the Alison Brittney women's puff sleeve top I styled with the Warners Vintage Pink nylon full briefs in this OOTD. This blouse also has some frilly feminine ruffles down the front. I love the length of the blouse which hits at my high hip.
TRANSCRIPT: "In this customer lingerie review I'm male-modeling a pair of Warners No Pinching No Problems No Muffin Top full brief panties in the colour 'Vintage Pink'. In this, uh, lingerie review, I've styled this pair of panties with an Alison Brittney floral peplum top. I've previously reviewed this brand of panties. Um, they're very comfortable, and I love this colour. Um, as soon as I saw that colour, 'Vintage Pink', I knew I had to have them. Um, I wish I could find some more of them. Uh, they're a very pretty panty. Um, this customer lingerie review is released into the public domain. Please feel free to share it everywhere."
The recently married law and commerce accounting graduate, lawyer, feminine fashion and lifestyle blogger extraordinaire Imogen of Tia_Cherie;
Thank all of you! You are all amazing, thoughtful, articulate, sweet, brilliant bloggers too! I feel very lucky that you visited and commented here.
Which blouse and panty outfit do you like better, outfit number 1 or outfit number 2? Which of the two blouses do you like the look of better, the black Laura Scott Crinkled Smocked Peasant Blouse, or the Allison Brittney Women's Chiffon Floral Ruffle Top? Which panty do you like the look of better, the Tender Bud Print Bali Skimp Skamp Full Briefs, or the Warner's Modern Brief Panty in Vintage Pink?
What do you think of the "Tender Bud" print on the Bali Skimp Skamp Full Briefs? How do you feel about the look of panties that have a vertical back seam? About the back-seamed "big pants" Renée Zellweger was seen putting on at the beginning of the movie "Bridget Jones's Diary"? About the way the Tender Bud Print Bali Full Briefs fit and look on me?
What do you think of the Vintage Pink colour of the Warner's Modern Brief Panty and of how they fit and look on me?
Was that too many questions?
You can see all but one of my customer lingerie review videos on my YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/misterpantybuns. I have disabled comments on YouTube due to trolls and the requirement to join Google+ to comment. Why should I let others comment on my videos if I can't myself?
I LOVE YOUR COMMENTS! PLEASE FEEL FREE TO AND DO INCLUDE LINKS TO YOUR FBLOGGERS LBLOGGERS BBLOGGERS LINKS BLOGS UNDER YOUR COMMENTS TOO! :D
P.S.: You can also Tweet me on Twitter where I am @Panty_Buns
Please free to share, embed and republish my videos and photos everywhere.
An alternate title for this post could be: Victoria's Secret Ruffled Babydolls paired with Shadowline Underwear For Women (Part 1).
I had originally intended this to be even more of an epic post on Shadowline's Style 17042 full coverage nylon brief panties than it already is. I had planned to include photos and embedded videos showcasing each of the five colours I have purchased them in: White, black, custom dyed pink, yellow and blue both all both with and without the optional extra lace at the leg-bands I ordered through Satin Rose Intimates, Who knows, maybe I will yet complete the post in a "Shadowline Underwear For Women Part 2". Between the time I started writing the post(s) and now, I ordered Shadowline panties from three different retailers including the custom dyed briefs with and without extra lace added around the legs. Unfortunately just recently I dropped my camera and it broke. Since I had only taken a limited number of photos (selfies in blue with no lace and pink with extra lace) and am unsure how long it will be before I purchase and get up to speed with a new camera I've decided to combine posts again. Obviously I'll have to limit the photos and videos to the ones I had taken and uploaded to my computer before I clumsily dropped and broke my camera. I had also purchased three blouses to style with the briefs which I guess I'll have to style in a subsequent outfit(s) posts. Even though I've included most of the text of what was to be the next post in this one I'm still considering doing a second post on Shadowline full briefs within the next few months.
SINCE THIS IS A VERY, VERY LONG POST, HERE IS A TABLE OF ITS CONTENTS:
1) The text describing the first two out of three recent shopping experiences at a Victoria's Secret store;
2) Lingerie fashion haul , OOTD and PHOTOS (would you call some of them blooper photos?)
3) An embedded selfie customer lingerie review video with blooper which might be a candidate for posting under http://www.reddit.com/r/cringe/ or http://www.funnyordie.com/Mister_Panty
4) The text describing the third of my three recent visits to a particular Victoria's Secret store;
5) The text of my review of the Shadowline style 17042 nylon full brief panties with Links to the places where I purchased the full briefs in the lingerie fashion haul and styled in my OOTD selfies photos and video, and for (hopefully) the next post (Part II) as well;
6) A thank you to lingerie companies who carry Shadowline briefs for following me on Twitter and their links;
I wasn't always complimentary of Victoria's Secret in the past,, occasionally going on long rants about their use of overly thin models. Although I have highlighted individual lingerie fashion pieces they carry I had refrained from buying some of them because I couldn't tell what they would look like on someone with a normal body.
What I had failed to include in my previous posts mentioning Victoria's Secret is that all the memories I have of shopping in-store at different brick and mortar Victoria's Stores are happy ones. Years ago I had briefly visited a Victoria's Secret store in the Bridgehampton Commons in Bridgehampton, Long Island, NY, and the store's manager had waited on me. She was so sweet and accommodating that I felt terribly guilty for not buying the Chiffon Flyaway Babydoll she suggested, even though that particular piece wasn't exactly what I was looking for. It was the polite helpfulness that I had encountered from the store's manager years earlier that made me want to return to this Victoria's Secret store again.
Quite recently I had some wonderful lingerie shopping experiences at that same Victoria's Secret store. It was immaculately clean and well stocked with very well organised neatly arranged apparel. All of the women working at the store in the Bridgehampton Commons (Long Island, NY) were friendly, polite and helpful.
On my first recent visit I homed in on the same area of the store and noticed some pretty babydolls with white satin bows and ruffled hems. They didn't the have puffy sleeves I normally look for and I was unable to find the sizes on the tags. After ascertaining that I might be in some need of assistance, a very polite, helpful young woman made herself available to answer any questions I might have. She was very polite, accepting of me, loved fashion herself, found out what my tastes were (we both like Betsey Johnson's fashions), and took me on a brief look around the store. She then checked the sizes on the tags of the babydolls I had initially taken an interest in for me. The biggest size they carried was a large.
Even though I'd let her know I was a size 18-20 (1X-2X) she offered to let me try it on in one of their lovely dressing rooms. After she held up an Dream Angels Ruffle-Trim Babydoll in Bright Apricot for me up so I could see the width at the chest, I took her up on her very considerate offer and she unlocked a dressing room for me.
The Victoria's Secret locking dressing rooms were fabulous, very clean and had gorgeous spotlessly clean full length mirrors both on the dressing room door and covering the entire wall opposite the door, so a person could get a good look at how they looked from the rear without having to twist around to see. They also had an ottoman to sit on and a rack to hang up ones clothes on.
I had my camera with me and was wearing a custom dyed blue pair of Shadowline nylon full briefs. Seeing the set-up of the dressing room and those lovely mirrors I just couldn't resist taking some selfies in the Victoria's Secret Ruffled Babydoll and Shadowline full briefs panties I was already wearing. It took a while because I wasn't used to taking selfies in a mirror.
I resisted the urge to "accidentally" lock myself out of the dressing room in just the lingerie when I was finished, let her know the babydolls fit me beautifully and bought a black babydoll as well as the babydoll in Bright Apricot. At checkout I initially forgot to sign, and then, flustered and blushing slightly, absent-mindedly left my credit card behind. She sweetly set it aside for me. I noticed I'd left it when I went to order more custom dyed briefs with extra lace the next day.
Naturally I had to return to Victoria's Secret for my credit card. I hadn't purchased the blue or mint coloured babydolls so, thinking ahead what colour full briefs would style nicely with mint or blue, I wore a pink pair of Shadowline nylon full briefs with extra lace for my second visit. A different young woman waited on me, and though I didn't feel the rapport I did on the first visit she was still very polite, helpful and accomodating. I learned that it was the birthday of the woman who had assisted me on my previous visit. On this visit to the dressing room I took some more selfies, and then tried making a selfie lingerie review video in the dressing room mirror. After two attempts at making a customer lingerie review selfie video in the Victoria's Secret dressing room the camera's batteries started going dead and I didn't have any spare batteries with me. If the battery hadn't run out of power for the camera I would have taken more photos and videos until I got some better ones, because the two I took were a bit cringe-worthy.
After paying for the babydoll, thanking the woman who helped me, and driving home, I uploaded the photos and videos to my computer and took a closer look at them. Do you think that the video(s) qualify as being "blooper" videos, and that many of the blurry photos to could fall under that classification as well? Obviously I did, hence the inclusion of the word "blooper" in the title of this post!
If you're so inclined, please let me know in your comments below which out of all the photos is your favourite - (they have numbers at the end of their titles).
Here are the photos of my first and second hauls of full briefs and babydolls, some of the selfie photos from the dressing room with some commentary and the embedded selfie blooper video I took in the Victoria's Secret dressing room, all of which I had uploaded to my computer before I clumsily dropped and broke my camera:
You can get a good look at the lovely extra lace at the leg=bands of the briefs and also see the superior design of the panties' cotton lined gusset in this close-up photo.
Some of the dressing room selfies from the first of my three recent visits to Victoria's Secret wearing a Victoria's Secret Bright Apricot Ruffle Babydoll and Shadowline Nylon Full Briefs custom dyed S.R.I. (Satin Rose Intimates) Blue:
Except for the fact that the flash is obscuring my face, this is probably my favourite from amongst the selfies I took. The bright apricot orange of the babydoll, the excellent design and tailoring of the cotton lined mushroom shaped full gusset, the sheen of the Opacitrique nylon fabric, and the custome dyed Satin Rose Intimates Blue colour of the full briefs all show up beautifully in this photo.
This photo was taken without flash. I took most of the rest of the photos with no flash, but that meant the shutter speed was slower and any movement caused the photo to be blurry. If you think this photo was blurry you should see some of the others I didn't include in this post.
This selfie came out fairly clear and you can see my face as I'm stupidly looking into the viewfinder of the camera instead of looking into the observer's eyes via the reflection in the big beautiful mirror I'm taking the photo of.
I took a lot more dressing room selfie photos (and two selfie videos) on the second of my three visits to Victoria's Secret wearing a Victoria's Secret purplish-blue Ruffle Babydoll and Shadowline nylon full briefs custom dyed Satin Rose Intimates Pink with added extra lace at the legs. Normally I need to take about 50 photos to come up with two to four good ones. Unfortunately the battery ran too low and I never got to the good photos, so here are some lingerie outfit photos that should have ended up on the cutting room floor unused. Even though I'm not happy with them I decided to go ahead and use them anyway because I wanted to get a post done:
Do these panties make my butt look big? The photo is a bit blurry but as you can see the Opacitrique nylon of the panty is opaque, and tell that the ruffly extra lace trim of the panties maintains its ultra feminine look when stretched. The length of the babydoll is perfect, not showing my back when I bend over but not covering the briefs up when standing.
A relatively clear photo with my face visible and even looking in the right direction! Even though I've gotten out of shape I think my arms and shoulders tend to make me look too masculine. That's why I prefer blouses and babydolls that have puffy sleeves when I can find them. I love the pink colour, generous gusset and extra-feminine ruffly lace of this pair of ladies panties.
This photo was close to being one of my favourites. I was looking a little sideways at the camera in the mirror and my pinkie got into the photo though I managed to I crop most of it out. I also think my arm looked a little too big and masculine. It's good I didn't flex. Other than that you can see that the babydoll and panty are both very pretty.
In these lat two OOTD photos I'm standing up rather than kneeling on the ottoman. The drawback of standing rather than kneeling is that it was harder to make sure I was entirely in the photograph and to keep still for the longer shutter-speed to avoid blurriness.
This photo was aimed too high and I moved so it blurred. On the left side of the photo (and in each of the dressing rooms) there is a Victoria's Secret pink Pink T-Shirt to try on if one wants. They must be popular.
This was one of the only photos I took semi-standing where I stood far enough from the mirror (and close enough to the dressing room door) to fit entirely into the frame without the photo coming out too blurry from me moving and not using flash. I love the femininity of this outfit of the day.
All of these photos of me male-modeling the Shadowline Nylon Full Brief Panties and Victoria's Secret Ruffle Babydolls are released by me into the public domain and may be shared and republished.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3) AN EMBEDDED SELFIE CUSTOMER LINGERIE REVIEW VIDEO perhaps better described as a BLOOPER SELFIE FASHION VIDEO which might be a candidate for posting under http://www.reddit.com/r/cringe/ or Funny or Die (feel free to share it there or anywhere else for that matter). ------------------------------------------------------------------------
While I was making this "selfie" customer lingerie review video in the mIrror of the Victoria's Secret dressing room I didn't feel nearly as relaxed as I had on my previous visit, when the woman who had assisted me had been the one who suggested I try the babydoll on and had been so accepting, helpful and reassuring. I had trouble keeping the camera lined up, hadn't rehearsed any lines, and kept forgetting the name of the brand of panties I was wearing. There were women outside the dressing room as I was taking the selfies and I could hear them talking, so I was trying not to be two loud. The nervousness in my voice as I was making this selfie customer lingerie video is clearly audible and women's voices outside the dressing room can be heard faintly in the background. Just to clarify where I may have misspoken slightly in the video: The briefs are opaque satiny Shadowline style 17042 Opacitrique Nylon Full Brief Panties from Satin Rose Intimates, custom dyed S.R.I. Pink with the optional extra lace at the legs. I paired it with a Victoria's Secret Ruffle Babydoll purchased in-store. I misspoke when I called it a "Babydoll top".
TRANSCRIPT: "In this customer lingerie review and outfit of the day video, I'm male-modeling and reviewing a pair of Satin Rose Intimates custom dyed Shadowline Panties in Satin Rose Pink with extra lace. I'm also, I've paired it with a Victoria's Secret Ruffle Babydoll top. Um, This selfie customer lingerie review is released into the public domain. Please feel free to share it everywhere."
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 4) The text describing the third of my three recent visits to a particular Victoria's Secret store; ---------------------------------------------------------------------
I made one more visit to the same Victoria's Secret store (in Bridgehampton) on "No Pants Day", Friday May 2nd, 2014. I had been shopping nearby and cruised past the Victoria's Secret store looking at it longingly. I saw the same nice young lady who helped me on my first recent visit to the store time looking out the window waiting for customers. I tried to muster my courage to go in with fantasies of a wonderful "No Pants Day" opportunity. Then I thought to myself that three visits in two weeks might seem like too much, that I might come off as being pervy, chickened out and started driving home. Then I thought about the babydolls I'd seen online on Victoria's Secret's website. I had seen a floral babydoll with puffy shouldered short sleeve. That thught overcame my lack of courage and I turned around and drove back to the store to see if any babydolls had been stocked in Mint, Red or Floral.
I told her about the First Friday in May being "No Pants Day", and asked if she'd seen any trouserless people. She hadn't heard about it or seen any. When I meekly asked whether she would consider photographing me for a "No Pants Day" post if I came out of the dressing room in babydoll and panties she said she would be worried about keeping her job if someone came into the store at that moment. I said I understood and dropped the subject. Little did I know at that point that when I had dropped my camera earlier it had broken and wouldn't have worked anyway. I didn't want her to feel uneasy, so I said that since the babydoll was the same style and size as the others I had bought there previously I probably didn't have to try it on. Sadly she agreed ;(( So I wound up not even trying the babydoll on, much less coming back out of a dressing room into the store to check out in my panties as a No Pants Day outfit.
I bought pink ruffle babydoll and got a free Victoria's Secret catalog. I told her I hoped her birthday had been a happy one and that her birthday wishes come true. In fact I totally chickened out of participating in "No Pants Day" all together, not just there but everywhere else too, and so another excellent opportunity for helping me realise my fantasy of being the world's most famous male panty model went to waste. Even so, my experiences shopping at Victoria's Secret were all extremely pleasant ones.
If you're ever in the vicinity of Bridgehampton, NY, I highly recommend shopping at the Victoria's Secret in the Bridgehampton Commons. The store is beautiful and its staff are extremely courteous and helpful. Even if they don't have exactly what you want the shopping experience there is fabulous.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 5) THE TEXT OF MY REVIEW OF SHADOWLINE Style 17042 NYLON FULL BRIEF PANTIES: -------------------------------------------------------------------
Full cut full coverage retro style full brief panties are often referred to as "granny panties". Unfortunately there are times I've seen that term used in a dismissive manor out of ignorance rather than in the affectionate appreciative way many of us feel about them. Attitudes have been changing what with full retro style briefs coming more and more into vogue along with the sheer couture that puts lingerie on display. Sometimes described as having retro or vintage styling, the classic full briefs I love usually have a high rise but are not high cut. My view is that if a panty is not full coverage then it is not classically cut. I prefer a rise of 8 to 11 inches (measured from the gusset to the waist) and side seams (measured from the leg holes to the waist) of seven to nine and a half inches. One impediment to the manufacture of what I consider "perfect panties" occurs when lingerie companies mistakenly cater to people who don't like underwear in the first place and don't want to look like they're wearing it. They hate panty lines. I am not one of those people. I love lingerie! In addition to its practical function, the gusset of a panty is a desirable fashion feature that contributes both to the looks of the panty and to a good fit. The gusset, in my opinion, should be an integral part of the design of the patterns used for the tailoring. Unfortunately with many brands of panties it seems that tailoring has been given a back seat (sadly not a pun) to the speed and reduced costs of sewing straight seams or of substituting stretchier fabrics for good tailoring. I can't help but wonder whether the difference in cost for fabric that has a fine denier, good tight weave and high thread count versus more coarse fabrics is a factor. Could short term profits be more important to lingerie company executives than customer satisfaction and a long term reputation for quality? In the recent past it has been difficult finding this style of panties in vibrant feminine colours that not only look pretty on me, but that are comfortable and are made of a fabric having a high thread count of a fine denier Opacitrique nylon, resulting in that wonderful slippery soft feeling against my skin that I love so much. It''s the combination of the looks, comfort and feel of well made panties like Shadowline that is why I love wearing ladies full brief panties like Shadowline so much. One reason I had not ordered that many pairs of Shadowline full briefs style 17042 in the past was that they were only made in white, ivory and black. I had previously ordered Shadowline Pants + Daywear Nylon Classic Brief Panty 17042 in white, size 6 from HerRoom and Shadowline Pants + Daywear Nylon Classic Brief Panty 17042 in black, size 5 from HerRoom Checking further, I found that one can also order three packs of these Shadowline Lingerie Nylon Classic Brief Panties Style 17042 directly via Shadowline's website in black, white, and ivory and also from ShopNational (The white briefs are the ones Satin Rose Intimates dyes in their custom colours). It was during the course of shopping for Carole full brief nylon panties that I noticed Satin Rose Intimates advertising Custom Dyed Panties on their website. I had liked both the tailoring of the gusset and the lace of the Carole briefs but custom orders take time and it would be important to me to make sure the briefs were the style with the softer nylon having a higher thread count rather than the somewhat more coarse style 845 Acetate briefs if I were going to place a custom order. Then, as I read further on the Satin Rose Intimates' website, I noticed that in addition to custom dyeing panties they also offer extra lace at the waist and the legs. Carole, Shadowline and Vanity Fair are some of the brands that they will custom dye in SRI pink, blue and yellow. I found the fact that they offer to sew extra lace onto the Shadowline briefs to very, very tempting - so tempting that I just couldn't resist. I went ahead and ordered 6 pairs of Shadowline full brief nylon panties from Satin Rose Intimates - 2 each in S.R.I. pink, yellow and blue, and I went ahead and ordered extra lace at the legs and waists of the pink pairs. After receiving them I liked them so much that I ordered 2 more pairs each of blue and yellow, 3 pairs of the pink, and one each of black and white all with the optional extra lace at the leg-bands. In the recent past it has been difficult finding this style of panties in vibrant feminine colours that not only look pretty on me. but that are comfortable and are made of a fabric having a high thread count of a fine denier nylon, resulting in that wonderful slippery soft feeling against my skin that I love so much. The company that makes Shadowline briefs, Velrose Lingerie, was a small family business started in 1914 in Philadelphia and has stayed a family business (third generation). Click here for the "about" link on the Shadowline Lingerie website. Here are some of the descriptions from the websites where I ordered pairs of these briefs: The Shadowline Pants & Daywear Nylon Classic Brief Panty 17042 description on HerRoom's website: "This classic nylon brief panty features a flexible fit that molds to your curves for the perfect fit. Made with Opacitrique nylon for a special soft matte finish. Flat elastic along waist and leg openings for less bulk. High rise. Full rear coverage. Sewn-in crotch. Please Note: This panty is made of Opacitrique 100% nylon satin tricot knit, which is a more opaque, modest fabric." "The Shadowline Pants & Daywear Nylon Classic Brief Panty 17042 features a flexible fit that molds to your curves for the perfect fit. Made of nylon with a cotton crotch lining. Shadowline's Pants & Daywear Nylon Classic Brief Panty features high-rise styling to cover more of your tummy." I purchased Shadowline Pants + Daywear Nylon Classic Brief Panties 17042 in black, size 5 and white size 6 from HerRoom. Quoting from Freshpair's website with respect to the Shadowline Nylon Classic Brief 17042: "Committed to exceptional quality and comfort, Shadowline delivers beautiful lingerie you can depend on. Made of silky nylon fabric, the Nylon Classic Brief features a comfortable high rise for more tummy coverage and a smooth seamless seat. Complete with covered elastic along the waist and leg bands, get the fit you want with Shadowline." IF YOU WANT SHADOWLINE FULL BRIEF NYLON PANTIES IN YELLOW, BLUE OR PINK WITH EXTRA LACE AT THE LEGS BE PREPARED TO WAIT AS LONG AS A MONTH OR SO. SATIN ROSE INTIMATES CAN'T AFFORD TO STOCK ALL COLOURS IN ALL SIZES WITH OR WITHOUT THE EXTRA LACE. CUSTOM ORDERS TAKE TIME. IN MY OPINION THE WAIT IS WELL WORTH IT. The pretty colours and extra lace are a lovely addition to an already lovely panty. Satin Rose Intimates has stepped up to fill the gap I had been waiting to see filled: Full cut full coverage quality nylon panties in the feminine colours of pink yellow and blue with lace at the leg-bands. I enthusiastically love wearing these panties and would love the whole world to be able to see for themselves how lovely they are.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 6) I want to taking this opportunity to say THANK YOU TO LINGERIE RETAILERS WHO BOTH CARRY SHADOWLINE BRIEFS AND ALSO FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER. Many apologies to those of you I've left out of this list. I'm followed by a LOT of lingerie companies and retailers. HERE ARE A COUPLE OF THEIR LINKS:: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 7) LINKS TO THE BLOGS OF the Fbloggers, Lbloggers, Bbloggers and FASHIONISTAS WHO COMMENTED ON MY LAST POST which was titled "Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs and Warner's Modern Briefs Reviews". THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS TO: ---------------------------------------------------------------------
The sometimes controversial and always thought provoking fashionista and philosopher Peet and her blogging dog Leos, a.k.a. Mister Fartz of the blog For Peet's Sake and Twitter @4PeetsSake;
MANY THANKS TO ALL OF YOU FOR YOUR FABULOUS COMMENTS!
Note: You can see all but one of my customer lingerie review videos on my YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/misterpantybuns. I have disabled comments on YouTube due to trolls and the requirement to join Google+ to comment. I have news for Google. There are plenty of trolls who have Google+ accounts. Why should I let the trolls comment on my videos when I can't even comment on my own videos without joining Google+? My total video views on YouTube are over 100,000 views and I suspect if I'd been allowed to comment my total video views would be way, way more than that. They already have well over 107,000 views if you count the one lingerie review video I deleted.
You can also Tweet comments to me on Twitter where I am @Panty_Buns
Please free to share, embed and republish my videos and photos everywhere!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 8) BEGGING FOR YOU COMMENTS: I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU THINK. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Should I have simply walked from the dressing room into the store in babydoll and panties on "No Pants Day" or better yet paid for the babydoll while wearing it and then driven home that way (with No Trousers on)?
Do you like frilly ultra-feminine fashions?
Which photo out of the ones in this post is your favourite? (they have numbers before the .jpg)
Which babydoll and which pair of panties do you like best ?
How do you think these panties and babydolls look on me?
Please don't be shy about commenting, and feel free to leave your Fbloggers, Lbloggers, Bbloggers and fashionista blog links with your comments below. Thanks! :D
I had intended this post to be a lingerie review of various pairs of women's full coverage underwear and my most recent fashion hauls. Instead I have gotten so pissed off at being repeatedly discriminated against, slandered and censored by social media corporations, that I decided to merely thank my commenters - and then go on a rant about discrimination and censorship - about the consciousless social media companies that have gotten into bed with prudes, bigots, haters and trolls - and about the avarice and greed of said social media companies trumping their consciences.
Before I get really rolling on my rant against discrimination and censorship by social media, let me first thank my commenters.
The beautiful Camila Faria of Não Me Mande Flores Twitter @_CamilaF_ who blogs about internet love and all the lovely things one can send as an expression of it other than flowers;
The pretty and popular fashion blogger from Poland Ania Zarzycka of the fashion blog Fashion with blog photos taken by her sister Klaudia;
The sometimes controversial and always thought provoking fashionista, photographer, artist and philosopher Peet and her blogging dog Leos, a.k.a. Mister Fartz of the blog For Peet's Sake and Twitter @4PeetsSake;
THANK YOU to everyone who follows, favourites and Retweets me on Twitter, follows me on Twitter, this blog, my YouTube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/misterpantybuns, and who have left comments on earlier posts but whom I haven't mentioned here.
My apologies for the length of this post. I doubt many people will take the time to read it all and check the links. At least there are some images to look at and (hopefully) some embeded videos to watch. Please feel free to leave links to your blogs with your comments. Thanks.
Here are a few of the blouses and briefs I had intended to review in June and July before the fucktards at YouTube wrongfully slandered me, censored/removed one of my videos and slandered me, issuing a "strike" against my account in a brazen high-handed display of sex discrimination and malice motivated by bigotry:
And many other briefs and blouses I never ordered because I was too discouraged by having giant social media corporations censoring my photos and videos, condemning them to the Orwellian "Memory Hole", and replacing links to them with lies about me and my reviews.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Onward to my rant about SOCIAL MEDIA DISCRIMINATION and CENSORSHIP: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's a real shame when social media escalates from enabling haters and trolls to actively slandering, censoring and deleting the posts or even the accounts of the victims of the discrimination and abuse, all at the behest of said haters and trolls. Social media are well aware that false-flagging trolls have commandeered their automated flagging activated "moderation" (censorship) programmes.
DISCLAIMER: I am not a lawyer. I highly recommend consulting an attorney or getting legal help prior to suing a large social media corporation for discrimination and slander, but it is important that we make some noise and say NO to censorship.
There have been plenty of people who have complained about wrongfully censored YouTube videos in the past, and YouTube has failed to address their censorship and slander problems. Most other other social media sites have failed to address their flawed and often discriminatory censorship problems as well.
Quoting from the article: "Let me say that again. FALSE FLAGGING is when a video has NOT broken any rules, but still gets flagged; and the owner of the video gets a strike against their account, even though they’ve done nothing wrong."
The article gives Google's phone number is 1-650-253-0000 and YouTube's (Google) fax number as 1-650-253-0000 but says, in essence, that calling or faxing the numbers is futile because Google simply doesn't care and won't talk to you.
. The article does acknowledge that search engines should be categorized as common carriers and therefore prohibited from censorship. The time is long past due for social media giants like Google, Facebook, Flickr, etc. along with the internet service providers to be classified as common carriers and brought to account criminally when they discriminate. In my opinion until they cease and desist from discrimination we should shame them wherever we can in the media, sue them civilly whenever practicable, and make a stink about their censorship to politicians who aren't bought and paid for (if there are any).
Facebook's "Community Standards" page states that they do not permit individuals "...to attack others based on their race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, disability or medical condition", yet Facebook and Google, hypocritically, have done the very things to their users that they prohibit individuals from doing themselves. Facebook and Google routinely censor people based on the above mentioned factors, i.e.: Censoring womens' nipples but not mens', and censoring men in full coverage panties but not women in sheer panties or with bared buttocks.
The claims made (pretexts used) by social media monopolies in the course of censoring unpopular speech and expression off the internet are usually that the videos in question somehow violate their "Terms of Service" or "Community Guidelines". Countless people have had the viewing their videos restricted and labeled with a vague and slanderous message, often asserting a specious reference to "Terms of Service" or "Community Guidelines".
Here are a few examples of Social Media wrongfully using their "Terms of Service" as a pretext to censor underwear and justify sex discrimination
Facebook went so far as to censor a photograph of a nude statue in a post about censorship by the American Civil Liberties Union. The ACLU asked "Why Was Our Post About Censorship Censored?" in their post titled: "Naked Statue Reveals One Thing: Facebook Censorship Needs Better Appeals Process". Think that was just an accident? I think not. Remember George Bush's Attorney General John Ashcroft ordering demanding that the breasts of statues be covered up? There are scads of pseudo-religious fanatical haters and wackos out there who apparently believe we should all have been born with clothes on and that babies should be blindfolded while breastfeeding.
Facebook outright lies about the fact that they censor people: In an article in TODAY.com Facebook was quoted as claiming "We've always allowed breast feeding photos". Shortly thereafter they flagged a breast-feeding photo saying "Please Review the Community Standards. Your Page, group or event was reported to Facebook. After reviewing the report, we determined one or more photos or posts don't follow the Facebook Community Standards". Clearly Facebook practices sex discrimination, lies in order to try to justify that discrimination, and lies about having done so. George Orwell's novel "1984" was prescient, and what was revealed in the movie Orwell Rolls In His Grave by Robert Kane Pappas was only the tip of the iceberg.
Sadly those who seek objective truth on the internet have a very difficult time finding it, and the task of truth-finding is getting more difficult as hopes for "Net Neutrality" seem to be fading away.
At the time of this writing there was a Wikipedia article titled "Internet censorship in the United States". That article noted that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the Child Online Protection Act (COPA) have both been found to unconstitutionally violate the freedom of speech and of the press guaranteed under the 1st Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
I couldn't help but ask myself: Could or has Google's coercive bundling of YouTube/Google+/Gmail become a much worse antitrust violation than the bundling of Windows with their browser Internet Explorer that wound up costing Microsoft millions of dollars in fines? Surely Google's coercive tactics in attempting to bundle YouTube, gmail, their browser, Blogger, Google search and more into a single Google+ account must violate antitrust laws. Have they become too big to prosecute?
Facebook is noted for operating well outside the envelope and relying heavily on its lawyers to defend its practices. Perhaps seeing how Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg have reaped billions of dollars per year from their monopolistic and datamining schemes (whilst their companies pay only millions of dollars in slap-on-the-wrist fines for monopolistic behavior and datamining) has proved too tempting for Google. Perhaps Google executives are letting avarice convince them to drop the word "Don't" from their former motto "Don't be evil", thus converting the motto to "Be evil" in hopes of becoming much more super-rich than they are.
Unfortunately it appears their avarice has annihilated whatever common sense they had and they have disregarded the technical advice they used to give in Google Help. Changing account names, titles and URLs screws up websites and accounts and hurts search results. Their CPU hungry graphics and scripts slow loading to a crawl, cause excessive buffering and synchronisation problems, browser freezing, and severely impair user experience. The hacking of browsers and disabling of private browsing to enable data-mining by the likes of DoubleClick does not seem to have slowed despite Google having to pay $17 million dollars for hacking Safari web browsers. The consumers whose browsers were hacked and whose data was compromised were never compensated - so where's my payment? Only Apple received the proceeds from the slap-on-the-wrist.
The hacking of Safari browsers defeated Safari's "Private Browsing" feature and destroyed anonymity. The Electronic Freedom Foundation Asked Virginia's Supreme Court to Take Anonymous Speech Seriously, noting that anonymous speech, including in customer reviews, are necessary for a free society. What Google's Doubleclick did was even worse that destroying anonymity. It enables Doubleclick to track Apple Computer users browsing habits across the web.. They then facilitated third parties to "...see which account on a social network is yours. They can then just go to your profile page, record its contents, and add them to your file. Of the 12 social networks surveyed in this paper, only one (Orkut) didn't leak any personally identifying information to third parties." Google's Doubleclick is far from alone in the rush to invade the privacy of and data-mine its users. Now, according to the SociaTimes, there has been a Global Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against Facebook in Europe for tracking its users on external sites and aiding the NSA's "surveillance and data-mining program, Prism".
On July 23rd, 2014 I came across an article titled A T & T, Chernin Group close to deal to buy YouTube network Fullscreen -tech blog | Reuters. If ever there were a case for declaring YouTube a common carrier, demanding Net Neutrality and that the anti-discrimination requirements of United States code and the Constitution prevail rather than YouTube's arbitrarily interpreted, vague and changeable "Terms of Service", the potential acquisition by AT & T should make the case for non-discrimination crystal clear.
So far Google seems to have turned a deaf ear to criticism both of its discriminatory censorship and of its coercive attempts to make YouTubers get Google+ accounts, disregarding all of the following:
Is Google violating its settlement with FTC in the course of its bundling integration of Google+ and YouTube?
Google is already being investigated by the European Commission's antitrust unit for anti-competitive tactics. and the business community has taken note:
It would appear to me that from Google's point of view money trumps both free speech and privacy as well. Here are a few more articles that I feel illustrate that:
I would love to be able to say YouTube, Google, Flickr, Facebook et al apologise when the discriminatory and wrongful censorship they have perpetrated is brought to their attention, but they don't and I can not. These internet behemoths tend to ignore even legal demands to cease and desist from slandering people. It is that inclination to ignore requests to cease and desist from slander after the facts are brought to their attention that resulted in Google losing in court when an Australian man sued them for defamation.
Thanks to YouTube's insistence on having a Google+ account to comment most of the "top" comments to the video have been made by trolls (Google+ enables trolls and discourages thoughtful commenters).
Here are some examples of the kind comments Google+ ENCOURAGES by making them top comments:
Mih Machado: "Your concepts are all fucked up. Don't lie to yourself, you are SICK your body is a piece of shit"
Antonello Mei "Shut up and go to the gym."
Jaja banks "she a hoe"
MrJusttestinghere "Stay off social media. Problem solved."
MartinLara1947"Well said"
I don't think it's a stretch to speculate that the troll sock-puppets that Google+ elevates to top comment status are indicative of the kind of entities that are false-flagging videos to get them taken down.
Do you think Google and YouTube censor everyone equally? Think again. As Meghan Tonjes stated, women who are slim or pleasantly shaped can generally flaunt their bare bottoms as much as they want.
YouTube employs different levels of high-handed censorship, One of their most often employed censorship tools is "restricting" viewing of the videos. Whilst Google's YouTube claims that they are restricting the videos to over-18 viewers, they do not operate the way most over eighteen sites do. Most adult sites merely require the would be viewer to click a button under a statement stating that they are over 18. Unlike those sites, Google's YouTube unethically requires viewers to have an account and sign in, presumably to try to increase the number of people they can claim as account holders whilst also keeping a record of their interests.
Google also censors and/or restricts images of me male modeling (back view) ladies full coverage panties. Capricious and arbitrary censorship by social media corporations is completely out of hand. According to the Wikipedia article on arbitrary censorship, blogger Mike Linksvayer "posited that free content licenses such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike are voluntary repeals of one's ability to arbitrarily claim the right to prohibit the distribution, modification or commercialization of a creative work." in his post titled "Retaining the right to censor is an act of hate". He in turn links to the Electronic Frontier Foundation article Say No to Online Censorship!
As the American Civil Liberties Union points out in their page on Internet Censorship: "... freedom of speech online continues to be threatened...""...the government has no right to censor protected speech on the Internet, and it cannot reduce adults to hearing and seeing only speech that the government considers suitable for children."
Unfortunately both governments and corporations are blocking, filtering and restricting sites and content broadly and arbitrarily. The Open Rights Group asks "Is your site blocked by UK ISP filters?"
After links and directly typed to this blog at http://www.full-brief-panties.blogspot.com were intercepted and redirected by my service provider I started wondering whether my blog URL gets blocked by other ISPs and how much of what I see is being filtered.
Occasionally when those who have been censored happen to own media outlets they manage to be heard about it. On 4 July 2014 Mail Online published an article titled: "Google backs down in censorship row".
Apparently, however, Google's YouTube has nothing but contempt for the bloggers who use their platforms.
Eight of my YouTube videos are currently "restricted", requiring people to "sign in" to view them, and two of my videos were removed and replaced with slanderous statements about me and my videos. Although the preview icon for the "Featured" video on my YouTube channel (Mister_Panty_Buns-loves-having-Hanes-Women's-Nylon-Panties-on) is visible you cannot watch it on YouTube without signing in because it is "restricted". It can, I believe, still be watched embedded here without signing in.
UPDATE: In addition to slandering me, lying aboutmy customer lingerie review videos, censoring my videos and restricting the viewing of them, YouTube has stooped to censoring the fact of the popularity of the "Featured Video" onmy YouTube channel, by artificially manipulating the view-count downward AGAIN. Here is the YouTube video embedded:
So far one doesn't have to sign in to watch it on VEOH TV
My customer lingerie review video taken modeling this lingerie fashion outfit of the day featuring full coverage briefs and no sexual content whatsoever was restricted by YouTube! Compare that image with the video thumbnails of women in lingerie videos that YouTube does not restrict, showing them as "you may also like" to people who view my video titled "MOV-Customer-Lingerie-Review-Vanity_Fair-Ravissant-full_briefs.AVI".
img-proof-of-YouTube-sex-discrimination.jpg
Being seen in public in ones underwear, in photos, videos, in newspapers, magazines, on billboards, and on television has become commonplace and yet some Social Media sites still cave in to pressure to censor it, particularly if the wearer is overweight or if their gender doesn't match the common gender association of their underwear.
The many underwear in public events, some of which I have written about on this blog, are generally not censored as much. Here s a list of some of those events. You can read about some of them in my earlier posts:
The list of celebrities out in public and on stage in lingerie is a long one and includes Lady gaga, Miley Cyrus, Kim Kardashian, Madonna, Rihanna, Shakira, and many many many more, but does this cause haters and prudes to hesitate from false flagging everyday people from doing lingerie reviews or posting underwear selfies? Nooooooo. The haters, bigots and prudes never rest from trying to make social media an instrument in implementing their own myopic desire for controlling everyone else. Unfortunately social media sites all too often accede to their demands. That doesn't stop the supermarket tabloids from publishing the photos though. (Example: Daily news article titled "Kelly Osborn bares her bottom in racy thong photo posted to Instagram" ).
Meanwhile, YouTube issued a "STRIKE" against my account for the customer review video of the full coverage shapewear panty brief featured in in my post titled: "Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Maidenform Flexees Shapewear Panty Briefs". The full coverage Maidenform Flexees Shaper Panty in the video that YouTube issued a "Strike" against my account for covered my bottom completely. The conclusion after comparison is inescapable. YouTube's censorship of my video was a hate-motivated act of blatant sex-discrimination as defined in the United States Code. Even if they acted at the behest of someone else they are at this point an accessory at least and acting in bad faith. Since I already requested that they "Cease and Decist" from slandering me, pointed out the fact that what they are saying is false and they have declined to desist, they can be sued for that continuing slander. The high-handed manner in which social media corporations treat their users is unconscionable.
I stopped uploading my lingerie review photos and videos tomy account on Photobucket (also gobbled up by Google) due to unpredictable, arbitrary and wrongful censorship.
I had considered uploading this image to Photobucket
to replace a photo that Photobucket censored (of me male-modeling Vanity Fair turquoise full briefs).
UPDATE: Jezebel published an article titled: "Nicki Minaj's Ass, Bent on World Domination, Gets Censored by Apple". The article asks: "Still, do black women need parental advisory stickers for the beach too?" At least she didn't have her video taken down and a strike issued against her account the way YouTube wrongfully did to me.
After not doing a blog post since early August, I've finally gotten around to doing another post. It's way too wordy and long and should have been FOUR posts instead of lumping them together as one: A thank you to commenters, a makeup and cosmetics haul, a lingerie fashion OOTD and review recap for the year 2014, and the 14th annual No Pants Subway Ride 2015. I included a few makeup and outfit questions further down, and there are a couple of photos and embedded YouTube videos.
First of all, THANK YOU to all the fashion, beauty and lifestyle bloggers who commented on any of the blog posts I did in the year 2014! I am very grateful, love reading what you wrote, and tried to include your links below in the thanks for your comments on any or each of the posts I did in the year 2014 (only nine posts), so many of you will find your own links listed below more than once. My sincerest apologies if you were left out if I mangled your name info or links.
PLEASE CHECK OUT THE BLOGS OF ALL OF MY FABULOUS COMMENTERS!
The hard-working (multiple jobs) fashion blogger and online marketing intern Ina R. a.k.a. Carina of Bad Taste Toast from Düsseldorf, Germany who recently (Oct. 2014) moved to Australia;
An additional THANK YOU to all of the other fashionistas who have been so kind as to leave comment on posts in prior years as well!
Here are a few of the things I've neglected to blog about in 2014 and 2015:
In addition to all the blouse and panty fashion hauls and OOTDs I've neglected to photograph, take videos of, try on, model and review, some of which I mentioned in my last post, I haven't blogged about the Essentials The Master Set from e.l.f. Cosmetics:
Have you ever tried elf EyesLipsFace brand makeup or any of the other brands with vegan cruelty free products I listed above? If so, which are your favourites?
A briefs bit about the 14th Annual NO PANTS SUBWAY RIDE 2015:
On the 11th of January 2015, thousands of people in countries around the world once again took off their skirts and trousers, riding subways and trains with their underwear showing for the 14th Annual No Pants Subway Ride. Originally organized by Improv Everywhere, the event has been growing every year and garnered the attention of many television news stations. Although the news coverage has been considerable, there hasn't been much in the way of on-air underwear / lingerie fashion reviews of the briefs, bikinis and boxers on display.
The post-New York City N.P.S.R. meet-up and after party was scheduled to last from 4:15 PM - 11:30 PM and commenced near 35 East 13th St. Union Square and then inside Bar 13, where there was a cover charge of $10 cover and identification required showing 21 years old plus. Outside at Union Square there were television news crews set up ready to make stars out of some No Pants Subway Riders who were there in their undies.
NBC TV's coverage of the New York City No Pants Subway Ride was lacking or impinged upon by their early talk about the imminent red carpet appearances of celebrities for the Golden Globes which was scheduled to be on NBC later that evening.
It's unbelievable that I managed to chicken out of so many "No Pants" events considering the scads of photos and videos of myself male modeling and reviewing full briefs that I've published and released on this blog and on my YouTube channel. I knew enough in advance that I could have taken a taxi to the nearest (Queens, NY) meet-up location at the Unisphere in Flushing Meadow Park at Sunday Jan. 11th at 3 PM - so many lame excuses for not participating.
Additionally I've failed to take any new haul and outfit photos for new posts on this blog yet this year or to make and upload any new lingerie review videos to my YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/misterpantybuns. If and when I do, if my Twitter (@Panty_Buns) is working, I'll Tweet that I've done so.
Which pair of full brief panties do you like the best out of the blouse and panty hauls and outfits I both styled on this blog and reviewed and male-modeled in the customer lingerie review videos I uploaded to my YouTube channel?
Note: Two of my videos were false flagged were censored and removed and the view counts occasionally go backwards on the featured video, and many require signing in to watch :(
I've put on weight and presently weigh over 95 kilos and am getting really old. Do you think I should I participate in an underwear-in-public event anyway? If someday I don't manage to chicken out, which pair of full brief panties do you think I should wear and which should I have worn to the "No Pants Subway Ride"? Solid colour briefs or print?
There were a lot of videos posted of the no skirt or trousers events that took place in cities around the world. You check out some of the undies that people who actually participated in the ride and after-party were wearing in the following screenshot and YouTube video embeds by Improv Everywhere and by the New York Daily news:
Have you tried e.l.f. EyesLipsFace Cosmetics? What brand(s) of vegan cruelty free makeup do you like best? Should I participate in a No trousers event? Which briefs do you like best? Will you remember to leave a link to your blog below? Thank you in advance for your comments!
Please feel free to leave links/URLs to your fashion, beauty and lifestyle blogs along with your COMMENTS BELOW
This post is way off topic for this blog, but I have posted it as a matter of conscience. It has to do with crimes committed under colour of authority by police in the United States and accessorial conduct by prosecutors, judges, the Congress of the United States, the Department of Justice and the news media. Wanton killings by police in the United States have become more the rule than the exception in America, and most involve the excessive and gratuitously violent use of deadly force.
Last night while Tweeting on Twitter I noticed that the number one World Wide Trend was #BreloVerdict. I clicked on it, and then Tweeted the news I'd learned to my roughly 700 Twitter followers: #Breaking #News Policeman Michael Brelo gets away with murdering UNARMED Malissa Williams + Timothy Russell, killed with 137 bullets fired. Note: you'll notice in the image of the actual Tweet below that I initially misspelled "Malissa". I read that the Judge who found the killer cop not guilty had deliberately delayed the verdict until after the holiday weekend rush hour traffic was done, was on friendly terms with the prosecutor and the P.B.A., and used a description of a golf tee shot in reading his verdict.
The First Amendment guarantees "the right of the people peaceably to assemble , and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances" yet this right was forcibly denied to the peacefull protesters in Cleveland Ohio last night.
The Cleveland police, in riot gear, surrounded the peaceful protesters, cutting off all routes of egress. Once they had the protesters "kettled" (trapped) they arrested them for failing to disburse. The surrounding and arresting had obviously been planned in advance. For the most part they forced the press out of the area, although prior to the mass arrests they had also been arresting legal observers and live streaming reporters, including Kris M. Wernowski (@kriswernowsky) managing producer of Cleveland Ohio news.
In a "bench trial", Judge John P. O'Donnell ruled policeman Michael Brelo "not guilty" despite the fact that, after more than 100 rounds had been fired, Brelo climbed up on the hood of Russel's car and shot the unarmed Melissa Williams and Timothy Russell through the windshield 15 more times at point blank range.
White people, of which I am one, are not generally aware of just how extreme racism and hatred are and can be in America, or perhaps I should call our country "AmeriKKKa". Many decades ago, back in my drinking days, I walked into a bar with someone I worked with who happened to be black. I had been in that bar many times before and never noticed anything unusual. This time I experienced hate stares.
Last night on Twitter I was stunned at the number of hateful racist and fascist (literally) Tweets on the #BreloVerdict. timeline. Some were even hawking stuff with swastikas. I BLOCKED a lot of Twitter users who were Tweeting that the unarmed black couple, Malissa Williams and Timothy Russell, had deserved to be shot and killed.
I took screen-shots of my own Twitter feed to memorialise some of the Tweets. I Retweeted a lot of people. The Tweets in the screen-shot images below are as they appear in the Twitter feed, with the first at the bottom and the last at the top (first below).
HERE ARE SCREENSHOTS TAKEN FROM MY TWITTER FEED LAST NIGHT, ON 24 MAY, 2015 (most recent first, oldest last). WARNING: THERE IS A GRAPHIC AND DISTURBING IMAGE OF THE COUPLE THE CLEVELAND POLICE MURDERED BELOW THE IMAGES OF MY TWITTER FEED
I agonised over whether to include the following photos or even the descriptions of them because they are very upsetting, but in the end decided the truth is best told by them.
HERE IS THAT GRAPHIC PHOTOGRAPH Please read the article that accompanied the graphic image of the murdered couple below was taken from: An article titled "Graphic Photo Depicting Brelo's Crime | Cop Block" by Deo Odolecki. It gives the following credit for the photo and text:
The hard-working (multiple jobs) fashion blogger and online marketing intern Ina R. a.k.a. Carina of Bad Taste Toast from Düsseldorf, Germany who moved to Perth, Australia in October of 2014 (three comments!!!);
The horse riding, art, literature, ballet and poetry loving sex education blogger Anna Louise, the author of the sexy (Blogger Content Warning) blog "Welcome to Anna's Place";
The pretty and popular fashion blogger from Poland Ania Zarzycka of the fashion blog Fashion with blog photos taken by her sister Klaudia;
Jeanne Christine, a lovely, young, recently engaged "Fil-Chi, twenty-something girl, born and raised in Cebu, Philippines, but now based in Adelaide, Australia" blogging about "happy-happy-joy-joy aspects" of life, including fashion travel and food at her blog Jeanne in a Bottle;
Sony Mingoss from Spain of the blog TRèS ChIC. who loves and blogs about the world of beauty and fashion. I tried Google translate on her comment and got: "Hi Is beautiful, I just want us to let us know by GFC? I love, I hope at: http://www.sonymingoss.blogspot.com.es/
Kisses!";
Here are a few other places you can find me on the internet:
It has been four months since my last Fbloggers Bbloggers Lbloggers post, and over a year since I made my last customer lingerie review video to embed on this lingerie fashion review blog, "Full Brief Panties". Buying full brief panties and blouses has not been a problem for me because I am totally addicted to buying and wearing full brief panties!
The arduous process of finding pairs of panties that have enough favourable qualities for me to want to review them on this blog may have limited the number of brands I've reviewed to date, but hasn't slowed the pace of my buying panties for myself that I'd love to be seen in and may change as I discover other full coverage briefs. I was a bit shy about having put on 30 pounds andwas having a hard time to getting up the nerve to take outfit photos and videos, but that is no excuse for failing to post. Needing a new camera has also slowed me down. Another lame excuse. Another attempted excuse: Having eight of my videos wrongfully restricted to viewing by only viewers with YouTube accounts, having two of my videos wrongfully censored and or removed, and subsequently being maliciously slandered by Google's YouTube, all at the behest of bigots, trolls, prudes and other lying fucktards, took all the fun out of blogging and Vlogging for me. When adverse actions are taken against me because the gender association of my underwear doesn't match my gender, that is very blatantly sex discrimination. I even had a photo Deleted from Wikipedia by THIS FUCKTARD, who gave the reason as "Low-quality, unused personal photo. Out of scope." It falsely claimed the media is missing permission information despite said permission having been emailed to Wikipedia and accepted previously.
This gratuitous censorship really irked me as did a number of my comments on Disqus marked as spam. I do not, nor have I ever, accepted any compensation whatsoever for my photographs, videos, or blogging, and have absolutely no financial motive to spam. The primary thing that made me consider doing this post, and one of the reasons I decided to review full briefs in the first place, is something a woman asked me 43 years ago about me wearing ladies panties: She asked "What good is it if nobody sees them?" If you read the comments to my posts you'll find that the vast majority of women who have left comments on my blog think I should participate in underwear-in-public events and go ahead and get famous showing off the panties I so love to wear - so much so that I feel ashamed and embarrassed for being such a chicken, especially after seeing the bravery of full-figured models like Ashley Graham and all the fabulous people who have participated in Freshpair's National Underwear Day and Freshpair's Confidence Project. Kudos to Freshpair's Chloe Daniels (Twitter @FreshpairChloe)
It's long past time for me put aside my feelings of hurt and resentment over past wrongful sex-discrimination-based-censorship and wrongful restrictions on some of my previous videos (at the behest of bigoted prudes and trolls), overcome my insecurities about my age and being out of shape, and finally get around to posting reviews of some of these fashion blouses and classic full briefs. Ashley Graham and the Twitter Hashtags referenced below are good motivational encouragement. There's more on Ashley Graham further down in the post.
The backlog of full brief panties I've bought but not reviewed yet is HUGE, and is still growing. I have referenced some of them in my last few posts, and some were purchased relatively recently. I had been hoping to get into better shape before making more male-modeled customer lingerie review videos to upload to my YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/misterpantybuns and for embedding in posts on this blog (or sharing and republishing) further showcasing my blouse and panty hauls. There are full brief panties I took photos of myself wearing yet have failed to take customer lingerie review videos in. An easy example is these Shadowline full briefs custom dyed S.R.I. (Satin Rose Intimates) blue:
You may have read in my earlier post titled "Shadowline and Victorias Secret Lingerie Fashion OOTDs and Reviews with Dressing Room Selfie Photos and Video with Blooper" that I had purchased Shadowline Style 17042 Opacitrique Nylon Full Briefs custom dyed in Satin Rose Intimates yellow, blue and pink as well as some in white and black, both with and without extra lace trim. Sadly, Susan of Freshpair is retiring and is no longer custom dying panties in those lovely S.R.I. colours. I wish her a very happy retirement and only wish I'd purchased more custom dyed panties beforehand. I still haven't taken any photos or videos in the S.R.I. yellow Shadowline panties - or any of the multiple dozens of other briefs I've purchased since my last post.
One of my many excuses for not taking new videos is that the camera I took videos with broke.
One might think I'd bought myself enough pairs of ladies full brief nylon panties for the moment, but noooooooo... not me! I've been window shopping the intimates on the ShopNational website (among many many others).
Vanity Fair Perfectly Yours Ravissant Style 15712 Tailored Nylon Brief Panties are a brand and style that I have purchased in many different colours. I have been wearing this brand and style of panties throughout much of the winter, meaning to model and review them but never getting around to it. It's a shame so few people have seen them on me. On the plus side I love wearing them to bed at night. They are very comfortable and have a delightful slippery soft feel against my skin. This particular brand and style of full brief panties is one of many that would be an excellent candidate for featuring in an edited video, showing off the many different colours (and prints) I've purchased these panties in. In the videos I've made and uploaded so far, I had manually pushed the record button, lurched into the frame, and then lurched back out of the frame to turn the camera off when the reviews were done . Here is one example of a video with me lurching into the frame and out again while reviewing a pair of these briefs (my apologies if you've already watched this one): MOV-Customer-Lingerie-Review-Vanity_Fair-Ravissant-full_briefs.AVI
As with all of the photos and videos of me modeling and reviewing panties, this video was released by me into the public domain and can be copied, shared and published everywhere.
In lingerie news, this pair of see-through panties made the news recently. Check out the stretch fishnet fabric of the back panel of the panties in this photo of the Body by Brinks Tropics turquoise lingerie set
Ashley Graham is making a big impact on the lingerie fashion industry - hopefully most of the other designers will pull their heads out of the sand and take notice of her success and the new trend in lingerie modeling!
I have to admit to still feeling miffed that YouTube removed (without permission and without notice) a popular video I uploaded for my post titled Lbloggers Fbloggers OOTD and Review of Maidenform Flexees Shapewear Panty Briefs and issued a strike against my account for it. If I had been female and wearing sheer briefs like the ones worn on the runway (see image below via POPSUGAR") I probably wouldn't have been bullied by YouTube the way I was.
img-Ashley_Graham-Addition_Elle-Lingerie-runway-show-at-NYFW.jpg On the runway, fine with YouTube, and video shown around the world.
YouTube wrongfully removed my customer lingerie review video featuring these briefs, slandered me, and then wrongfully issued a strike against my account.
Hopefully I'll be getting it together and take some new photos and videos reviewing and showcasing some of the briefs and panties I've purchased before the year is out.
To the "British born bohemian beach bum leading a fashionable life in tropical Australia"Rachel-Beth of the blog The Daily Luxe and Twitter @TheDailyLuxe
If you'd like to check out more of my male-modeled full brief panty reviews, photos and videos, here are a few other places you can find me on the internet:
All of the photos and videos above were taken by me, I am the model in all of said photos and videos, I am over 18, and I RELEASE AND HAVE RELEASED ALL PHOTOS AND VIDEOS OF ME SHOWCASING AND/OR REVIEWING FULL BRIEF PANTIES INTO PUBLIC DOMAIN. PLEASE SHARE, RE-POST, PUBLISH AND REPUBLISH THEM EVERYWHERE!!! (No strings attached). I'd love it if they were broadcast on television, published on the covers of newspapers and magazines, and displayed on billboards everywhere. :D
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO INCLUDE LINKS to your fashion, beauty and lifestyle blogs WITH YOUR COMMENTS BELOW.
I love reading your comments, checking out your blogs, your youtube channels and your Tweets on Twitter.
I would have preferred to be blogging about my latest lingerie and fashion hauls rather than going on a rant about discrimination, trolls and censorship again. When my old computer died I lost everything on it including all of my documents including my rough drafts, notes and research for future posts and the URLs for blogs I like to look at and read. Another setback I had was having my camera break, and not having one that will take lingerie fashion OOTD videos. Despite all of that I had thought I would be somehow manage doing some new lingerie fashion haul, OOTD, and review posts by now complete with photos and embedded videos.
The backlog of full brief panties and fashion blouses I've purchased and have been planning to review keeps growing larger.
Before I launch into tearing Disqus a new one for lying about me and removing innumerable blog comments I've made, speciously claiming they were spam, I'll begin with the post with A huge THANK YOU!!! for commenting on my last post titled “Fbloggers Lingerie Haul, Excuses, Old Pics, Lingerie News and Thanks to Commenters"TO the following Fbloggers Bbloggers and Lbloggers. THANK YOU:
Now on to the subject of this post's title: Disqus LIES - and then lies about having lied. I discovered that Disqus has been lying about my thoughtfully composed and arduously hand typed comments, marking them "Detected as spam" and removing them from view for over a year. The owners of the fashion, beauty, lifestyle and other blogs and websites where I left my thoughtful and complimentary comments had no idea that Disqus had removed the comments or that I had even made them.
I made numerous attempts to contact Disqus support and Disqus help, all to no avail. I even took screenshots of the thoughtful comments I'd made that had the red Disqus lie "Detected as spam" label, but there was no way to redress my grievances. Apparently Disqus enables comment trolls to moderate blogs and when busted for it makes the lame excuse that they are not responsible because their algorithms did it. Eventually I took to Twitter to contact some of the bloggers whose blogs my comments had been wrongfully removed from. The screenshots I took both of the comments I made and the responses from bloggers learning of the comment removal prove that Disqus LIES
Here are the screenshots of those Tweets and of my false-flagged comments on Disqus:
This was just a sampling of the comments I've made that have been wrongfully flagged as spam and removed by Disqus. If you are a fashion beauty or lifestyle blogger and have Disqus installed, and if it is practical, I would love it if you'd check to see if I have made comments that have been wrongfully removed. It burns me up to think about how many bloggers might have found me but for the comment removals. I am sooooo glad I that I did not install Disqus on this blog.
Hopefully my next post will be back on topic. Thank you to any fashion beauty and lifestyle bloggers who made the effort to read this far.
Please don't be shy with your comments questions and suggestions - I LOVE reading them!!! I plan to mention commenters and include their links in my next blog post. Please feel free to LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS with your comments too - I love visiting your blogs :D
In the lingerie fashion OOTD photos and video below I'm male-modelling a too-tight but very pretty pink pair of Pink K brand Women's Nylon Brief Panties from Kmart. I took the photos and video three years ago, in January of 2013. In the photos and video I styled the pink nylon Pink K brand panties I was wearing with a too tight Green Surplice Peplum top in the colour "Green Appletini" from JCPenney. I did upload two out of the four photos I took previously and included them in my previous post titled "National Underwear Day 2013, Lingerie Fashion, Briefs in News and Blogs". The other two photos and the flubbed/blooper video are published here for the first time - almost three years after they were taken.
Here are quotes from my mortified self from that earlier post, trying to explain why I hadn't uploaded the video to YouTube:
"My excuse for not uploading the review back at the time I made it was that in the video I referred to the panties as Pink brand pink panties. After I'd made the video I saw that they were clearly marked "Pink K" on the tag. Pink K brand is unrelated toVictoria's Secret PINKbrand panties, which I have yet to purchase, wear, and review. Good grief! You'd think I would at least get the name of the brand of panties I'm reviewing right when I actually have them on, but nooooo.... I had forgotten what the package said when I bought them in the store and then missed the "K" in Pink K when I read the tag."
So here are all four photos and that flubbed lingerie fashion OOTD and review blooper video (embedded):
IMPORTANT! I MISSPOKE IN THIS (FLUBBED) VIDEO. The full briefs being modelled and reviewed by me in this 4 Jan. 2013 video are Kmart's Pink K brand, NOT Victoria's Secret PINK brand. Comments on this lingerie fashion review video may be left on my blog Full Brief Panties http://www.full-brief-panties.blogspot.com/
Transcript: "The pair of full brief ladies full brief nylon panties I'm modelling and reviewing today is a pair of Pink Brand [sic] pink nylon panties - from Kmart. I got them in a size that was too small for me - I got a size 6. Uh, Pink brand [sic] panties tend to run a little smaller than the Vanity Fair or Warners or Bali. uh, they're very similar in sizing to a Teri full brief. As you can see they're a lovely pink colour, a fully opaque nylon panty. Um, they have an, a nice lace waist, um. They're a ver, just uh generally a very pretty panty. I wish I could find, uh, panties in a lot of other brands in this same pretty pink. Uh, today I've paired this, this pair of, uh, knickers with a green Surplice Peplum top from JCPenney. The colour is called Green Appletini. This customer video lingerie review is released into the public domain. Please share it everywhere"
Here are some of the other places on the internet where you can find free photos and videos of me male-modelling full brief panties to browse, share and publish anywhere and everywhere:
Whilst I do very much like the pink colour shown, the pretty all-over lace, and the full rear coverage, you can see in the photo above that the waistband of the panty does not come anywhere near the natural waist.
I'm considering trying out this panty despite the slightly high rise of the leg openings, but I'd want to see it in person at the store first, as I prefer not to return items and I'd like to make sure to purchase it in a size that will fit me.
I'm still hoping to acquire a camcorder to make new lingerie fashion haul and OOTD review videos for future posts. A couple of the blouses and full briefs I purchased and hope to publish reviews of in 2016 are the:
What do you think of the pair of Pink K brand panties I'm seen modelling in the photos and video above? What are your thoughts about the photos and video of me? Do you have any thoughts or suggestions about me posting and releasing the photos of me and my flubbed / blooper video for sharing and re-publication? Thanks in advance for any comments and questions
PLEASE DON'T BE SHY WITH YOUR COMMENTS QUESTIONS AND SUGGESTIONS - I LOVE READING THEM!!! I plan to mention commenters and include their links in my next blog post too, but please feel free to LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS with your comments below as well - I love visiting your blogs and you leaving your links makes that easier. :D
Normally I try to include a photo or two of myself modelling full briefs in my posts about lingerie related events. For years I have been writing of how I'd love to participate in "No Pants Subway Ride", but I failed to once again, being an hour or so late getting ready - and am very disappointed with myself for not getting it together in time. I had a pair of panties picked out that I wanted to wear in the event: this pair of Lucy B Pink and Black Polka Dot High Waist Panties.
There are a couple of things in Improv Everywhere's instructions for the No Pants Subway Rides that I wish would be disregarded much more than they already are, namely: Their admonition for journalists attending in New York asking that they not to take out professional cameras during the event. Also, after getting the initial reactions from other subway riders I think it's great when participants inform others about the event and encourage them to join in. A nice example of that happening was captured on camera in this video uploaded by Kagome (@15kagomay on Twitter):
Please don't be shy with your comments questions and suggestions - I LOVE reading them!!! I also plan to mention commenters and include their links in my next blog post.
Please feel free to LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS with your comments too - I love visiting your blogs :D
Thanks to Commenters, an Unreviewed Bbloggers Makeup+Beauty Haul, Fbloggers Lingerie+Fashion Hauls, a couple of old pics, and Underwear-In-Public-Events I've Missed
THANK YOU to everyone who commented on my last blog post! I've included your links further down in this post.
MY APOLOGIES for taking so long between posts, for failing to take any new lingerie fashion outfit and review photos and videos, for failing many more times to participate in any of the recent underwear-in-public events, and for failing to do a makeup video. In addition to being very tardy I got lazy and merely included two lingerie fashion haul photos - along with a couple of pics and a video from two earlier full brief panty reviews.
In the interim, here's a photo of a Bbloggers beauty and makeup haul - I haven't reviewed the cosmetics in the photo yet either - I need to get more motivated somehow.
img-Bbloggers-beauty-and-makeup-haul.jpg
Here is a list of the elf cosmetics makeup and beauty products in the makeup+beauty haul:
The e.l.f. in the name elf Cosmetics stands for eyes lips face. All of e.l.f.'s products are vegan, cruelty free, PETA approved, and, in my opinion, reasonably priced.
Here is a partial list of some of the panties and blouses I've bought this year (and inexcusably failed to take photos and videos of myself in) - that hopefully someday I might model in new https://www.youtube.com/user/misterpantybuns/videos YouTube lingerie fashion review videos to embed in my blog posts here. So sorry for all the delays and excuses (It would serve me right to be on the receiving end of a few a good old-fashioned spankings for motivation). I procrastinated so long that many of the links for the blouses and briefs no longer work - but here some of them are anyway:
Here are a couple of fairly old photos of another pair of full coverage Dixie Belle lace trimmed nylon briefs paired with a Style+Co teal floral tiered ruffle blouse, including a photo of me modelling them. It's a different photo in a different blouse from the one I published in my first (November, 2009) post on this Blogspot blog, titled: Dixie Belle Full Brief Panties , but it was taken around the same date. I never got around to making a YouTube lingerie fashion OOTD review in these Dixie Belle full coverage panties. Maybe someday I will.
I bought several pairs of these Dixie Belle Lace-Trim Full Brief Panties in pastel pink, pastel blue, and white.
A little over three years later one of my full-brief-panty review videos came close to going viral before meeting with foul play (That's happened three or four times now). I'm referring to the third of six videos from my January 2013 post, titled: A Briefs Update Part 4 - with Customer Lingerie Review Videos
Not all that long after I first uploaded that lingerie review video of myself in Warners "Hibiscus Petal Pink" briefs to YouTube (embedded below), I noticed it had gotten a couple of thousand views within the space of a day or so. Googling myself, I found that someone had posted a link to the video on Reddit. I loved it. There were hundreds of interesting comments and questions. I don't remember what category it had been posted under. Sadly bigoted trolls and/or bigoted moderators not only false-flagged it and got it disappeared, they also got my own "Mister_Panty_Buns" Reddit account taken down. Then, in 2014, someone posted a link to the video on Reddit once more - this time under the heading: "Seriously WTF Mister Panty Buns" (and here: https://www.r3dd.it/p/2g77n5/) Sadly there was only one comment. It would seem that all those interesting earlier comments from the prior posting of the video's link on Reddit have been lost, and the video is currently only ninth on the list of my (Mister Panty Buns) most popular lingerie review YouTube videos. Here it (and a photo)are:
I've dreamt of becoming the world's most famous male panty model, seen everywhere, and love it when my panty-modelling photos are shared and re-published!
Here are a few other places you can find me (and my photos and/or videos) on the internet:
I very much LOVED discovering my blog posts shared on this site recently: RSSING panties992 RSS snapshots of Full Brief Panties. I LOVE finding lingerie review photos and videos of me and/or articles posted on the internet (and in newspapers and magazines)!!!
All photos and videos of me male-modelling full brief panties are released into the public domain, are free, and may be copied, shared, displayed and published without limitation or restriction. Please feel free to share, re-post, publish and re-publish them anywhere and everywhere.
To the fabulous Fblogger, lawyer, and accountant Imogen from Sydney, Australia of the wonderfully feminine fashion and lifestyle blog Tia_Cherie, YouTube Tia Cherie’s Channel/videos;
I plan to mention commenters and include their links in my next blog post. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS WITH YOUR COMMENTS - I love visiting your blogs! :D
You can see my other lingerie fashion OOTD and review videos on My YouTube Channel and Tweet me on my Twitter @Panty_Buns.
Please don't be shy with your comments questions and suggestions - I LOVE reading them!!! I also plan to mention commenters and include their links in my next blog post.
PLEASE feel free to LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS along with your comments too - I love visiting your blogs! :D
THANK YOU to my blog Followers for sticking with me. This is my first post since August 28, 2016!!!
I have included a briefs THANK YOU to fashion beauty and lifestyle bloggers who commented on my last post a bit further down on this page, and tried to include links to your blogs, your YouTube channels and your Twitters.
I apologise for how long it has taken me to publish this post, and for not having taken any new lingerie review videos to embed in this post. I feel very grateful to the two women who, to my delight, obliged me and took the four photos below of me modelling the panties I reviewed in this post (with my camera). I'm so sorry for having left out the details - I edited out a total of 32 paragraphs of text that I had originally included in the rough draft of this post, but it is probably better that I learn to write shorter posts anyway. :/
THE REVIEWS:
Both of the Lucy B Lingerie high waisted nylon panties shown and modelled by me in the photos below are an absolute delight to wear! The leg-bands of the Lucy B Lingerie high-waist panties sit at the fold between ones' bottom and legs. The pattern and fabric used in creating the panty along with the tailoring of the curved rear seam of the cotton lined gusset yield an excellent fit with genuine full coverage comfort.
As you can see, the Lucy B Lingerie Spring Blossoms High Waist Panty is very pretty and wonderfully feminine in appearance. Although the California, U.S.A. made 100 percent nylon panty is relatively closely woven, soft and smooth, it is in fact, as the name of the stretch nylon helenka fabric of the panty implies, quite stretchy. These Lucy B Lingerie high-waisted panties are a true full coverage panty, and are extremely comfortable to wear. I recommend Lucy B Lingerie's high-waist panties very highly.
I did notice, however, that this Lucy_B-Lingerie-Lavender-Zebra-High_Waist-Panty was, at the time of this writing, still available in all sizes (X-Small through XX-Large). I am thinking of purchasing a couple of pairs. Lucy B. Lingerie high-waist panties are made in California (U.S.A.).
When I first compared them to other panties I own that are labeled size 6, I thought perhaps I had ordered these pretty Shadowline panties in too large a size (I had ordered them in size 6 as well). The closely woven knit of the Satintrique® nylon fabric yields a slippery soft feel and the briefs are patterned and tailored to be a true full coverage panty. The generous gusset with classic curved rear seam, the 9 1/2 inch side seams,10 inch rise, the 'full coverage contour' pattern and the excellent tailoring yield a panty that provides true full coverage without ride-up, even for those having a full bottom. The panties felt slightly more snug at the waist that I had expected, but turned out to be exactly the right size for me. I am wearing a pair of Shadowline panties right now as I type this. I have previously purchased one of Shadowline's other styles of full coverage panties (the Shadowline style 17042 Classic Nylon Full Brief Panty) from three different retailers. I love that style (17042) too, but it was the new colour Peri Frost (a pretty and vibrant periwinkle) of the Style 17032 Shadowline panty that helped me finalise my decision to make this most recent purchase. I love the colour Peri Frost and enjoy wearing these comfortable panties all day long.
Quoting from the Shadowline website: "These women's brief underwear are made with comfortable nylon and feature a high rise, full coverage contour with hidden elastic for a custom fit."
There are other brands that make and sell the kind of full coverage full brief panties I like to wear. Hopefully I will return to more active blogging and review more of them on this blog in the not to distant future.
I LOVE finding lingerie review photos videos of myself in blog posts, and in newspaper and magazine articles, and hope more people and websites and will re-post and publish them in the future.
All photos and videos of me male-modelling full brief panties are and have been released into the public domain by me, are FREE FOR REUSE and may be copied, shared, displayed and published without limitation or restrictions. What good is it if nobody sees them? Please download, re-upload, share, Tweet, post, re-post, publish and re-publish them everywhere!!! :D
Which of the three panties I reviewed and modelled above is your favourite, and what do you think of each the different colours and prints of the ladies full brief panties I was seen and photographed modelling?
Panty number 1) The Lucy B Lingerie panty in pink with black polka-dots; Panty number 2) The Lucy B Lingerie panty in Spring Blossoms floral print; Panty number 3) The Shadowline Hidden Elastic Panty in Peri Frost
Do you have any suggestions for how I can go about getting more famous in my panties? Please don't be shy with your comments questions and suggestions - I LOVE reading them!!!
I currently plan to mention commenters and include their links with a "Thank you" in my next blog post, much as I did in this one. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS WITH YOUR COMMENTS - it makes it easier for me and other commenters to find and read your blog posts :D
A COUPLE OF APOLOGIES: I'm sorry I took so long to write and publish this post. It's my first post since October 1st of 2017, ten months ago. I still haven't bought a decent camcorder to replace the camera I dropped and broke in May of 2014, and my attempts at full brief panty modelling and review photos have been pathetic. The length of time I have been promising to take new full brief lingerie fashion outfit photos and procrastinating is epic. I was finally motivated enough to post by the fact that today, August 5th, is the 15th National Underwear Day. I also apologise for how long my posts are, partly as a result of my having procrastinated for so long.
ABOUT MY FULL BRIEF PANTY SHOPPING ENDEAVOURS: I have a hard time finding classic retro full coverage panties and sadly, when I do find some I love it seems they often go out of business except for bespoke (custom) orders (Dollhouse Bettie). Susan of Satin Rose Intimates, who used to custom dye and add lace, retired, Lucy B. Lingerie makes classic full coverage briefs, but runs are limited and larger sizes sell out quickly. Picking the right size in orders from Secrets in Lace can be hit or miss, and sadly What Katie Did briefs don't quite have full rear coverage, being slightly higher cut. Some Elomi sets have a full cut, but vet few of the bottoms come up as high as the natural waist. Bali, and Maidenform were taken over by Hanes, and only the Bali Free Form panty has the classic retro fit. Shadowline, Carole and Vanity Fair Ravissant all have classic full coverage cuts, thought the design of the Vanity Fair Ravissant gussets aren't as large and full cut as they once were. I often see attractive lingerie pieces window-shopping online at luxury lingerie retailers that have prices so high that I don't dare splurge out of fears they will not fit - I hate to return items and have never returned any of my panty purchases.
TODAY IS NATIONAL UNDERWEAR DAY, August 5th, 2018 - Here are a couple of links referencing it:
Since, as usual, I've failed to go out and participate in any of the National Underwear Day events, the least I can do is to finally publish a couple of photos taken of me by a women to whom I feel very grateful for having obliged me by taking them as I attempted to model a pair of full brief nylon panties. She took three photos on that occasion. Since it was on the spur of the moment I hadn't worn or brought a blouse to style with the panties, so I simply posed in the what I was wearing at the time. Unfortunately my poses and facial expressions in one of the photos was so laughably lame that I had refrained from publishing it - up until now.
Here is a photo of a pair of panties which I bought recently in the same brand and style as the pair I was modelling in the photos below, but in a different colour, and but without me in them:
HERE IS ONE OF MY FAVOURITE EXAMPLES OF PANTIES IN THE NEWS SO FAR IN 2018:
In February of 2018 Shay Mitchell, best known for playing the character Emily Fields in the television series 'Pretty Little Liars', ran around the streets of Los Angeles, including down Sunset Boulevard, wearing nothing but a pair of pretty yellow panties that said 'Nice Buns' on the bottom, a pair of white sneakers and a unicorn mask. She was seen by multiple people on the street, in cars, and undoubtedly from many residences and shoppes along the way. Sammy Rosenman (Twitter @sammyinlala), who held Shay to her earlier promise to go streaking in L.A. if she reached 3 million subscribers on YouTube, recorded the video of Shay's streak from her car as Shay as went running around the streets and sidewalks of Los Angeles bare breasted and wearing just a yellow pair of panties.
Shay then uploaded the video to her https://www.youtube.com/user/ShayMitchellOfficial/videos ShayMitchellOfficial YouTube Channel where it has since received well over four million views. The video is titled 'I Ran Naked Through The Streets of LA!' | Shay Mitchell - YouTube
Shortly after the video was uploaded Sammy Rosenman then Tweeted on her Twitter: "After countless humiliating episodes of Send Sammy, I finally got my revenge".
Shay's streak got a lot of media attention. Here are links to a few of the articles covering Shay's pantied topless run around the streets of Los Angeles:
I have to admit that I was feeling more than a little bit jealous of Shay's courage and panties-in-public fame when I Tweeted the this wish on my Twitter:
img-Tweet-of-my-Twitter-wish-for-pantied-fame.jpg
img-Twitter_Media-Panty_Buns-pics-in-panties.jpg
And here is a written release with links included:
I LOVE finding lingerie review photos videos of myself in blog posts, and in newspaper and magazine articles, and hope more people and websites and will re-post and publish them in the future. After all, What good is it if nobody sees them? PLEASE FEEL FREE to download, re-upload, share, Tweet, post, re-post, publish and re-publish them everywhere!!! :D
WHY I DISABLED COMMENTS ON MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL:
The reasons I felt compelled to disable comments on my my YouTube (Mister Panty Buns's) channel videos are: 1) YouTube demanded that commenters sign up for Google Plus in order to comment. I refuse to do that. Meanwhile, Google has allowed YouTube to become TROLL CENTRAL.
2) The YouTube team has not only allowed and encouraged hateful trolls to run amok with their hateful gender association discrimination, elevating their hate to "top comment" status, but they have additionally allowed YouTube's system to be used to false-flag, censor, vote down and restrict my videos. Not only is YouTube's commenting system hopelessly broken for those of us who are targeted by bigots, but it seems bigots infiltrated the YouTube Team itself, skewing 'moderation' (censorship) and causing restrictions and removals of the videos of their targeted victims. Article in Jezebel: Butthurt Ex Google Google Employee Who Wrote The Anti-Feelings Diversity Memo Lost His labor Relations Challenge. I suspect James Damore is just one example of a variety of bigoted trolls who have infested Google and the YouTube team, asserting their right to govern others according to their own bigoted 'value' systems.
SEX DISCRIMINATION BY GOOGLE'S YOUTUBE:
Many mornings on television I have watched women modelling Breezies nylon panties being on QVC. I have also watched full brief nylon panties by Hanes panties and Fruit of the Loom modelled on TV innumerable times, yet the bigoted Team YouTube has wrongfully restricted viewing (requires people to sign in) of me modelling+reviewing the exact same panties.
False flagging my reviews of opaque full coverage briefs because the gender association of the apparel being reviewed does not match my gender is transphobic SEX DISCRIMINATION. Given the pattern and practise of this censorship, perhaps Google's YouTube Team should be both regarded and officially designated as a HATE GROUP. The restrictions, making people log in to view many of my videos, has cost me hundreds of thousands if not millions of views.
Of course none of that is an excuse for my having failed to have taken or had taken more full brief panty OOTD modelling and review photos and videos for this blog.
The fashion, beauty, and lifestyle bloggers who comment on my blog are fabulous! I hope the readers of this post will visit their blogs. I have included their links below:
To LucyHollman whose blogger profile is blank and who left the visible url to a blog http://www.fashiongirl.blogspot.com/ (which had one post on October 13, 2001) but was linked to a Shein page selling an appliqué drawstring hem hooded jacket the url for which in turn credited referral from the blog The Colorful Thoughts by Nadush Twitter @Nadush1103;
To Hannah ("Anonymous") from welschnofen hotel ( http://www.hotelcentral.it ) - THANK YOU for your fabulous comment and wishes. I really love it! :D ;
to Jyoti of the fashion beauty+lifestyle blog http://www.rampdiary.com/Rampdiary and Twitter https://twitter.com/rampdiary@rampdiary;
HAPPY NATIONAL UNDERWEAR DAY!
What do you think of the colour, style and appearance of the panties I modelled in the photos above? What are your thoughts related to the photographs of me modelling them? Should I have been as courageous as Shay Mitchell and ventured out somewhere very public to show them off?
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS, YOUR YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND YOUR TWITTERS, ALONG WITH ANY THOUGHTS, COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE BELOW. I LOVE READING THEM. THANK YOU!!!
Halloween snuck up on me again. I failed to replace my Eva Gabor wig and all man made high heeled boots from Tall Town, both of which were apparently damaged by the mothballs I stored them with. I could also use a new garter belt, long line bra and waist-cincher, as the ones I own have all gotten a bit too small for me to fit into comfortably. I used to love getting done up in full drag a lot. I went out in full drag on every Halloween in during the 1980s, on a number of New Year's Eves and many times when there was no particular occasion at all. The truth is, it was not just about a costume for Halloween for me. I have always felt repulsed by men and feel thoroughly disgusted by the fact that I am one. The primary reason I never got a sex change operation was that I was concerned that I'd have to deal with men even more than I already do. I much prefer the company of bi and lesbian women. I hung out with a number of bi and lesbian women in 1980-1983, and passed as a woman in "The Duchess" (a lesbian bar in NYC) for over a half an hour back in 1981. I think I was probably more of a lesbian then than the character "Lisa" was in "The L Word".
My sincere apologies for how old these photos of me in full drag (and one of me modelling Dollhouse Bettie Retro 50s High Waist Satin Panties) are, but if I'd waited until I'd taken new photos who knows how long it would have been.
This is my second post of the year (finally).
Below are a few rare photos of me in full drag from a few Halloweens long, long ago:
One of the contributing factors to my feelings of discouragement with respect to taking new photos and videos of myself modelling and reviewing blouse and full brief panty OOTDs is the fact that YouTube has restricted viewing of so many of my lingerie review videos after they were apparently false-flagged by bigots and trolls, many of them just within this last year.
Sadly, the tyrannical totalitarian Trump regime has given free reign to bigots to assist in its systematic oppression of all minorities. YouTube has been a willing participant in that process, routinely practicing Sex Discrimination by wrongfully restricting viewing of (censoring) lingerie review videos if the gender association of the underwear does not match the gender of the model, saying: "we've determined that while your video does not violate our Community Guidelines, it may not be appropriate for a general audience." Not at all dear YouTube: You do not have the right to censor based on my gender not matching the gender association of the apparel I model and review.
A quote from Anthony Romero of the American Civil Liberties Union: "All corporations have a responsibility to ensure that their franchises understand that discrimination is unacceptable and illegal."
Are you listening, YouTube? Your restriction of the viewing of my videos is illegal censorship.
I guess I might as well throw in a panty-modelling photo while I'm at it:
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LEAVE LINKS TO YOUR BLOGS, TO YOUR YOUTUBE CHANNELS AND TO YOUR TWITTERS, ALONG WITH ANY THOUGHTS, COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE BELOW. I LOVE READING THEM. THANK YOU!!!
Dear Google and Blogger: Logged in status fails in new windows. This blogspot blog malfunction is not only preventing preventing me from commenting on other Blogger blogspot blogs, IT IS PREVENTING ME FROM REPLYING TO COMMENTS ON MY OWN BLOG! Please fix this Blogger blogspot malfunction.
Best wishes for year 2021 to all of my commenters and Followers on this blog, to all my subscribers on my YouTube channel and to all my Followers on Twitter (@Panty_Buns). My apologies for not actively blogging and posting videos recently. All of my YouTube videos are straight-forward customer reviews of apparel taken of and by me, and feature me modelling and reviewing full coverage full brief panties paired with complementary tops (blouses, babydolls etcetera). My videos are all released by me into the public domain and should be considered labeled Free for ReUse. In fact, their release into the public domain was both stated verbally by me in most of my videos and included in writing in the transcripts published with them. Sadly, YouTube very wrongfully restricted the viewing of many of my favourite videos, insisting that people have a YouTube channel and log in in order to view them. I do not accept money or any form of compensation related to my blogging or to my customer reviews of apparel on YouTube or on my blog or on my Twitter. It should, therefore, come as no surprise that I have been somewhat lacking in enthusiasm for wasting my time and effort making+uploading new customer full brief review videos to YouTube, especially given that my camera and tripod both broke and that I've gotten older and more out of shape. Maybe I'll get up the ambition to do some new posts in this coming year. In the meantime, I'll gratuitously include one of my favourite customer full brief modelling and review photos from my 6th of May, 2014 post titled Shadowline and Victorias Secret Lingerie Fashion OOTDs and Reviews with Dressing Room Selfie Photos and Video with Blooper
I wish you all serenity, health, courage, wealth, wisdom and happiness in year 2021
All photos and videos that are OF ME wearing, posing in, modelling, or available to be seen in ladies full brief panties, whether on this blog, in videos, (including any and all videos on my YouTube (misterpantybuns's) channel), on my Twitter media, and anywhere and everywhere else, including on or in any old photographs, images, dvds, videotapes (consider this a model release) have all been, were, and are, all irrevocably and forever RELEASED BY ME into the PUBLIC DOMAIN, both at the time they were made and confirmed again right here and now. They should be considered, and are in fact, all LABELED FREE FOR REUSE. All are ABSOLUTELY FREE to be uploaded, downloaded, re-uploaded, shared, posted, re-posted, published, re-published and distributed and displayed ANYWHERE AND EVERYWHERE without limitations. PLEASE FEEL FREE to share, publish, republish, distribute, post and display them ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE, including but not limited to blogs, videos, online+print news+gossip articles, magazines, posters fliers+billboards, Movies, TV+streaming media and everywhere else. AFTER ALL, WHAT GOOD IS WEARING ESPECIALLY PRETTY PAIRS OF PANTIES IF NOBODY SEES THEM? Are you smart enough to figure out how to make sure I become permanently famous in my panties? Even if you're smart enough, are you too chicken to help make it actually happen? I TRIPLE DOG DARE YOU to try your best to make me as famous in my ladies full brief nylon panties as you possibly can! Nyah Nyah Nyah Nyah Nyah! :D Here are the the most recent six (out of hundreds) of the photos of me modelling womens' full coverage nylon underpants that I Tweeted most recently on my Twitter @Panty_Buns all of which are free for re-use and sharing:
Photo from my January, 2013 Fbloggers post titled A Briefs Update Part 4 - with Customer Lingerie Review Videos which included my video featuring me wearing blue Bali panties and a Fuchsia smocked lace top, titled male models Bali Sleek Comfort full brief panties. WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS? Any favourites? Any amusing ideas for sharing them? Please don't be shy! Please also feel free to leave links to your blogs, YouTube channels and Twitters along with your comments! Thanks in advance!
All photos and videos taken by me of myself modelling, posing in, or available to be seen wearing ladies full brief nylon panties were all irrevocably and forever RELEASED BY ME into the PUBLIC DOMAIN in real time as they were being created (including ANY and ALL of the videos I uploaded to my YouTube channel, and to my Twitter media, and anywhere and everywhere else, including on or in any old photographs, images, dvds, videotapes (consider this confirmation of my model releases). Here are are twelve more photos and videos from my prior posts on this blog (all of which I have previously Tweeted publicly on Twitter) that you are free to use, share and publish: Labeled Free for Re-Use:
Photo from my January 1st, 2013 blog post A Briefs Update Part 4 - with Customer Lingerie Review Videos featuring me modelling and reviewing a pair of Warners Hibiscus-Petal-Pink No Muffin-Top Modern Brief Panties styled with a V-neck blouse by Alfani in the colour cornsilk yellow Mister Panty Buns models and reviews Warners Hibiscus Petal Pink full briefs which was wrongfully restricted by YouTube (Sex Discrimination). In addition to slandering me across the internet, YouTube has violated antitrust law by attempting to claw this video back out of the Public Domain, claiming it is only available on YouTube when, in fact, the release into the public domain was made by me in real time as I made the video and is included in the transcript underneath (which YouTube hides from public view). Labeled Free for Re-Use:
Photo from my 13, April, 2014 Fbloggers customer lingerie fashion two blouse+panty outfit and review lookbook post titled Bali Skimp Skamp Briefs and Warner's Modern Briefs Reviews, which included my embedded video titled Lingerie Review Bali Intimates Skimp Skamp Full Brief Panties featuring me modelling a fully opaque pair of Bali Skimp Skamp full brief panties from One Hanes Place styled with a Laura Scott Women's Plus Black Crinkled Peasant Blouse from Sears. These panties have been shown being modelled on daytime television, yet YouTube, in a blatant act of sex discrimination. restricted the viewing of this video because my gender does not match the gender association of the apparel being reviewed. Labeled Free for Re-Use:
Photo from my December 27th, 2015 post titled A Flubbed Lingerie Fashion OOTD Review Video and Thank You Commenters along with my video Flubbed lingerie fashion OOTD + review Pink K brand womens pink nylon panties with green peplum top - YouTube (in which I misspeak, accidentally calling the panties Pink brand instead of Pink K brand). ------- My hope is that all photos and videos of me wearing ladies full brief nylon panties will be downloaded, uploaded and re-uploaded, emailed, shared, Tweeted, published, posted, ReTweeted, re-published, re-posted and displayed without limitations, absolutely ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE, including, but not limited to in and on blogs, videos, online+print news, gossip and entertainment articles, magazines, posters fliers+billboards, movies, TV+streaming media and everywhere else. AFTER ALL, WHAT GOOD IS WEARING ESPECIALLY PRETTY PAIRS OF PANTIES IF NOBODY SEES THEM? I triple dog dare you to try to make me famous in my panties!!!!!! Which of the photos of me wearing ladies panties is your favourite? What are your thoughts and suggestions? Please don't be shy! Please also feel free to leave links to your blogs, YouTube channels, Twitters and other social media!
It is National Underwear Day 2023!!!!!!
IS IT TIME TO SHOW MY PANTIES? :D
I apologise for having for the most part wimped out yet again.
Unlike many younger and braver souls I will probably not be physically
running around out in public somewhere with my panties on full display.
Before I get to the almost predictable re-uploaded and re-posted links and screenshots of myself modelling ladies nylon panties, hoping to compensate for in-person timidity,
here are a few informational links about this entertaining underwear-exposing holiday!
Regarding National Underwear Day | Freshpair:
(quoting from Freshpair's website):
"Freshpair® founded 'National Underwear Day 20 years ago on August 5th, 2003, as a way for everyone to embrace their underwear with confidence''In 2013 we invited thousands of people to Times Square to break the Guinness World Record for the largest gathering of people in their underwear.''National Underwear Day has been featured on CBS, Good Morning America, Fox News, Live with Kelly and Michael, The Huffington Post, and dozens more."
The following five images are screenshot grids each containing six video thumbnails from free for re-use videos of me modelling and reviewing ladies full coverage full brief nylon panties (back view only) arranged by upload date, from newest to oldest. I have included the video links for each of the panty review videos shown in the screenshots of the thumbnail photographs.
P.S.: I also not only Tweeted links to ALL of the videos above (along with free for re-use photos of myself in those pairs of ladies panties from each of the related blog posts on Twitter REPEATEDLY, but I also uploaded a collage of my panty-modelling photos for my Twitter Header photo!!!!!!
Here is the original of the header photo that I uploaded:
img-@Panty_Buns-Twitter-header-photo.jpg
... and how my Twitter header looked back on 7 November, 2021:
FREE FOR RE-USE!!!!!!
Attention bloggers, reporters, columnists, publishers, broadcasters, etc., etc., etc.:
Please feel free to make use of any and all images, photos and videos that are OF ME wearing, posing in, modelling, or available to be seen in ladies nylon panties ON THIS BLOG, on my Twitter (@Panty_Buns), in videos I uploaded to my (misterpantybuns's) YouTube channel, and anywhere and everywhere else, including old photographs, images, dvds, videotapes etcetera. They were all RELEASED BY ME into the PUBLIC DOMAIN (Labeled FREE for RE-USE) even before they were published.
They are ABSOLUTELY FREE to be emailed+shared, published posted+displayed uploaded, downloaded, re-uploaded, shared, posted, re-posted, published, re-published and distributed and displayed absolutely ANYWHERE and EVERYWHERE,ANYWHERE, including, but not limited to in and on blogs, videos, online+print news, gossip and entertainment articles, magazines, posters fliers+billboards, movies, TV+streaming media and everywhere else. After all, what good is wearing especially pretty pairs of panties if nobody sees them? Please feel free to use and share them wherever and whenever you want (anywhere and everywhere)!!!!!!
After all, what good is wearing especially pretty pairs of panties if nobody sees them?
I triple dog dare you to try to make me as famous as you possibly can in my lovely ladies full brief nylon panties! Nyah Nyah Nyah Nyah Nyah! :D
P.S.: I would love it if you Follow me and leave comments on
my YouTube (misterpantybuns's channel) and / or Follow and Tweet me on my Twitter @Panty_Buns!
P.P.S.: Please don't be shy with your comments, thoughts and suggestions!
P.P.P.S.: Please also feel free to leave links to your blogs, YouTube channel videos, Twitters (if Twitter still exists when you read this) and other social media accounts! xx
